Helping You Reclaim Your Power

The impact of in-car technology on distracted driving litigation

On Behalf of | Sep 18, 2024 | Car Accidents

Distracted driving accidents are becoming increasingly common. It is important to understand how in-car technology contributes to these incidents. These situations often raise complex questions in personal injury claims.

How technology causes distractions

In-car technology, while designed for convenience, often creates significant distractions for drivers with roughly 3,000 people dying annually from distracted driving. Adjusting the GPS, changing music, or taking hands-free calls diverts attention from the road. This split-second distraction can result in serious accidents. 

This distraction serves as the basis for many personal injury claims. Traffic laws strictly prohibit cell phone use while driving, so proving that technology contributed to an accident can affect the outcome of a case.

Proving distracted driving in court

Proving distracted driving caused by in-car technology presents challenges in personal injury cases. Lawyers gather evidence from various sources, including phone records, vehicle data logs, and eyewitness testimony. Courts often consider the driver’s negligence a key factor when awarding damages to the injured party.

Legal implications for drivers

New York’s strict distracted driving laws impose serious legal consequences on drivers who cause accidents while using in-car technology. These consequences can include both criminal charges and civil liability. 

In personal injury claims, an at-fault driver may have to compensate the injured party for medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages. These can easily total in the thousands of dollars.  

Navigating the legal landscape

Adapting to technological advancements while maintaining road safety is a shared responsibility. Collaborative efforts among drivers, manufacturers, and legislators can lead to solutions that minimize distractions. They may also bring clarity to legal processes in personal injury cases.

Archives

FindLaw Network